Reasons on Why CDR report Gets Rejected by Engineers Australia

 

So, where did everything go wrong? Was your CDR turned down? Did you write your report all by yourself? Were you adequately prepared for the CDR evaluation?

Reasons on Why CDR report Gets Rejected by Engineers Australia

Why did your CDR get rejected? This blog is specifically for applicants who were denied on their first attempt. Our specialists will break it down for you in bullet points.

CDR Reports are often rejected, despite considerable time and effort. As a result, it is critical to follow Engineers Australia’s rules when writing a CDR Report. You should be able to provide relevant information about your engineering abilities and professional experience. Your writing should be detailed while still adhering to the MSA guidelines. Learn what frequent errors were discovered in the report and how to avoid them in the future.

Engineers Australia assesses your skills, talents, and knowledge by analyzing your CDR. Before relocating to Australia, Engineers Australia demands that you achieve the necessary abilities in the engineering profession that you have claimed. As a result, Engineers Australia evaluates engineers with a bachelor’s degree in engineering who the Washington Accord does not cover. For your CDR to be accepted, Engineers Australia needs a high-quality report. The MSA handbook rules must be strictly followed. The chance of getting a CDR report accepted when prepared by applicants is very low.

The CDR report will be rejected if it is not written according to Engineers Australia’s rules and criteria. If you are unsure how to create a CDR on your own and want the finest results, you may hire CDR writing professionals.

Engineers Australia requires a Competency Demonstration Report (CDR) to examine your abilities and qualifications. As a result, candidates must provide a high-quality report demonstrating their professional talents. Even if you take additional precautions, you may make certain typical blunders when creating a CDR. And these errors might lead to your CDR Report being rejected. When a CDR is not written in accordance with the requisition, it is rejected.

Common mistakes Applicants Encounter while CDR Writing.

The following is a list of frequent errors made by candidates while preparing a CDR for the Engineer Australia Skill Assessment.

1. Split a project into two career episodes.

When creating Career Episodes, a lot of individuals make this error. They split the same project into two sections and show it in a separate Career Episode. Engineers Australia requires that you detail one project timeline in each Career Episode.

For example, a Mechanical Engineer created his Career Episodes based on tasks completed throughout his Engineering Course’s seventh and eighth semesters. The goal of this project was to develop and simulate a wind turbine.

When he was in the seventh semester, he completed his first project. The project entailed gathering data, conducting a literature study, and developing the wind turbine’s procedure. As a result, he talked about this endeavour in his first Career Episode.

In the eighth semester, the second project was completed. The goal of the project was to finish the analysis, testing, and modification of the proposed wind turbine and the design and simulation report that resulted. As a result, in his second Career Episode, he wrote about this effort.

Even though these two projects had separate grades and were completed for various objectives during his academic career, EA considers them to be components of the same project because they were both completed to build a wind turbine. The second phase of the project was built on the foundation of the first. As a result, EA views this project as a single project completed in two parts.

2. Writing a Group Activity Episode for a Career

This is the most typical error people make when describing how their group or team worked, solved problems, and finished projects. CDR, on the other hand, is intended to evaluate your abilities rather than the teams’. It evaluates what you did on that project, what your job was, how you accomplished it, how you collaborated with others, and so on. As a result, write your report in the first person, emphasizing what you accomplished rather than what your team accomplished.

As an example, An academic project completed throughout his engineering studies was mentioned by a mechanical engineer. The project was completed as a group, and each team member was responsible for a particular aspect of the project.

The group worked on a project involving wind turbine design and modelling. The tasks were separated into four categories: literature study, design calculation, project design, project analysis, project modification, component selection, project manufacturing, and project testing or implementation. The mechanical engineer was involved in the following tasks as part of this project:

• The project’s design
• The project’s evaluation
• The components are chosen.
• The project’s testing or implementation

So, rather than describing the works (literature review, design calculation, design work, analysis, modification, fabrication, testing, and implementation) done by the group to complete the project, he needed to describe their duties and responsibilities (design work, analysis, selection, and testing) in his Career Episode.

Design work that we completed in software using mathematical calculations for design work. For example, he stated, “We conducted the design work with the Creo Parametric 2.0 design program.” For the design job, we utilized various tools such as lines, spline, extrude, sweep, and so on.

He should have stated, “I did the design work in Creo Parametric 2.0,” instead of “I did the design work in Creo Parametric 2.0.” I created the design in Creo using various tools like lines, spline, sweep, extrude, etc. The software’s design work is based on mathematical calculations for the design. The final design is depicted in the diagram.

3. Plagiarism from Samples Found on the Internet

This should never be done. The CDR Sample offered by various sources is for educational purposes only. Engineers Australia uses a variety of technologies to identify copied material. So, whether you did it on purpose or by accident, you’ll be caught. Read the sample, take notes, and write your Career Episode on your Projects in the same manner as in the CDR Sample.

4. CDR in a foreign language

Engineers Australia requires that you provide your CDR report in English. Please speak in Australian English and do so properly. If you authored your Career Episodes in a language other than English, you must translate your report into English. Otherwise, EA may not be able to analyze your CDR report since they do not understand it.

5. Grammatical and Spelling Mistakes, as well as Report Formatting

When you give the EA your CDR report, you submit an official document that a professional should have produced. As a result, you must pay close attention to its layout, spelling, punctuation, and sentence flow in your CEs. This is an area that many people overlook. Make sure there are no problems in the flow of sentences, such as spelling and grammatical faults. Because you’re presenting your report as a professional, it should appear to have been written by one. These are tiny errors, yet they have a significant impact on your grade.

Another reason for the CDR’s rejection

• Excessive Technical Detailing: It’s fine to include some necessary technical information in your projects, but too many technical details, such as computations, charts, tables, photographs, and so on, on each project event diminishes the report’s quality. A CDR should provide concise information rather than lengthy and detailed facts that readers may find tiresome.
• Many individuals make the mistake of providing information on the bullet point while constructing a CDR. Many people offer their important material as bullet points, while it should be presented as paragraphs. Engineers Australia considers it to be one of their most important criteria. So, in paragraphs, sufficiently explain your statistics and other facts so that it is readily understood.
• There is no mention of details such as length, location, firm profile, or project goal. This material must not only be included but it must also be presented in chronological sequence. This information must be included in your report.
• Engineers Australia has established precise guidelines for the number of words submitted in each area of the CDR Report. Each Career Episode must be at least 1000 words long and no more than 2500 words long. Adding further details and lengthening your career episodes will not help you earn a favourable rating. As a result, you must choose and present vital facts and information to meet all of Engineer’s Australia’s criteria. More information on the optimal length of a CDR report may be found here.
• Not adhering to the Report Structure: When writing a Career Episode, the first paragraph should be an introduction of around 50 words, the second paragraph should be a background of 200 to 500 words, the third paragraph should be a body and main paragraph, and the final paragraph should be a summary of about 50–100 words. Here’s where you can learn more about the CDR Guidelines.
• Problem Statements Aren’t Mentioned: This is a critical aspect of the CDR Project. Make sure to include problem statements and the methods you took to solve them in your CEs. The project specifics you worked on and what you did as part of the project should focus on your Career Episode.
• There are no specifics regarding the Design Activity: Design activities are accorded high importance in the CDR evaluation. As a result, be sure to showcase any innovative engineering and technology experience with creating tasks. Lack of design expertise might make it more difficult for your CDR to be accepted.

Why should you hire experienced Writers?

Engineers Australia’s standards and the most recent modifications are familiar to CDRwritersautralia.com, an Australian-registered firm. Your CDR will benefit you the most if it is written by someone who has engineering experience.